Daily Survey Announcement

[luvhockey]

I'm late to this---ummm---party?
Just reading about all this tonight. I'm also one of those that used different emails for the members of my family who do surveys. Sept & Oct I got quite a few, about 20 each month. Nov Dec & Jan only a few. Maybe that's why I'm not blocked because I got burnt out trying?

So, I tried to do a survey just now. It let me in and after about 20 pages I didn't qualify (that bites big time as always). It went back to the 'there are no surveys you qualify for' page. Or am I blocked?

And I'm really annoyed that they think we don't take time to give honest thoughtful answers on surveys. Everyone, including GF knows they average about 20 minutes apiece. What is their idea of 'taking your time'?

Angela

[chipndale]

I would, respectfully, have to take the other side and request that she not publish any list for privacy reasons. Anyone that has read this thread knows that if they can't get a survey, they've been tagged. If you can get a survey, you haven't. Many, including myself, have volunteered that information but I see no need for SR to publicly disclose that information.

Anyone could take a look at that list and come to conclusions that may be inaccurate or unfair, not knowing the circumstances why each name has been placed in "time-out." Plus, I think there are ways for those who are a lot more computer savvy that I am to trace email addresses and that would be a major privacy breach. This is a public forum, visible to anyone who wants to look at it and sometimes we get a very false sense of security here and post way too much personal information. Now, if she would decide to send individualized emails to members advising if they're on the list, that's a totally different scenario.

I am certainly against the cheating tactics of the person who used all of those emails that have been previously listed on the board but, I must be honest, I was surprised to see a list of email addresses posted on the forum. I'm just thinking there's a possibility that one or two of them could be "real" and not fake. Even though what they did was very wrong, I don't feel it's the right of members in this public forum to have access to that information - It is for SR and possibly GF to deal with that person on a one-on-one basis.

I was just joking. Everyone has been talking about being on the "naughty" list, "good" list or not knowing where they really are. I never expected Tricia to list us by our email addresses. Sorry if you misunderstood what I was saying. Tricia has said that about 2/3 of the SR users are on the list - heck even her own mother is on the "list" All I was joking about was for Tricia to list by the user names that we use for Sunshine those not on that "naughty" list. The "acceptable" list would be really really short. Sorry for the confusion, I was just joking.

[Debbie Jean]

I hope it all gets worked out and SR is one big happy place again!

Well, Tricia & the SR family definitely has the knack for taking lemons and making lemonade so I'm sure that things will work out.

After getting over the initial shock of essentially being called "a cheater", I'm through feeling guilty. We played by the guidelines we were given and are being penalized for GF's poor management of their system. Maybe this had to happen so they'd get their act together. Once the new arrangement is in place, I hope they will see the wisdom in "un-banning" us so we can show them we do indeed know how to "play by the rules" when we know what they are.

What's most important to me is that Tricia understands this and believes in her members.

[askomsky]

Well, Tricia & the SR family definitely has the knack for taking lemons and making lemonade so I'm sure that things will work out.

After getting over the initial shock of essentially being called "a cheater", I'm through feeling guilty. We played by the guidelines we were given and are being penalized for GF's poor management of their system. Maybe this had to happen so they'd get their act together. Once the new arrangement is in place, I hope they will see the wisdom in "un-banning" us so we can show them we do indeed know how to "play by the rules" when we know what they are.

What's most important to me is that Tricia understands this and believes in her members.

Same here, as more info was released I stopped feel guilty and more mad/upset that they're acting like we're all the bad guys.

[spring]

This is how I see it: I've never gotten a speeding ticket, never got a parking ticket, I've never been in jail, I guess it was time I got "nailed" for something! It took good old Greenfield to end my streak of "goodness!"

[SunshineGirl]

Just an FYI from Greenfield....they have given us some updated "guidelines" to post and are saying that the ban will be lifted "in a week or so."

[bellanlivismom]

Thanks Tricia for keeping us in the loop!!

[jl8595]

Thanks for the update Tricia!

[Alice28]

Just an FYI from Greenfield....they have given us some updated "guidelines" to post and are saying that the ban will be lifted "in a week or so."

Thanks for letting us know.

I have to say that I bet it's because Greenfield saw their earnings go WAY WAY down once all of us dutiful survey takers were unable to do any.

I so wish I could do some shopping right now- I'm dying to both throw some $$ SR's way, and build my account back up. it's the lowest it's been in months and months.

[PSL1013]

Another whole week of withdrawals?